Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So entitled. How do you expect Google to pay it's content creators that you watch if they didn't have ads?




The issue is obviously one of trade-off.

Google pays content creators so little they have all started including ads in their videos. Si technically as long as you are counted they get paid. Meanwhile, Google is more and more aggressive with their own ads interrupting videos and pushing you to subscribe to their expensive offer.

Some people, like me, have just stopped watching YouTube. Other are turning to blocking ads.

It's the usual tug of war between revenues and UX but I don't think consumers have to feel bad about not playing by Google's rules.


>Some people, like me, have just stopped watching YouTube. Other are turning to blocking ads.

Just use viable FOSS alternatives like NewPipe or PipePipe. They are good and clean. They allow to watch or download YT content, without ads.


I will be downvoted, but I'm not fooling myself. I don't care. As long as uBlock and yt-dlp still work, I'll use them. If Google breaks them, I'll resort to some automated screengrabbing + maybe some AI automation to click "skip" in a virtual machine or something.

People will use all sorts of excuses, like the ads are about gambling, or contain viruses, or are detrimental to mental health, or whatever. No, don't use these excuses. You just don't want ads, and it is still possible to not see them. That's respectable.


I'm not sure how those are "excuses". They are reasons to not want ads. Ads are fundamentally malicious, so you should remove them from your life. I don't view attempting to "influence" me as a valid way to make a living, and am unconcerned with those who want to do it in the same way that I'm unconcerned about what would happen if someone tried to scam people with early wins in a shell game, but people just took the early win and walked instead of placing a big bet. That's just comeuppance.

I will up vote you since you make no pretense about it.

When Google's ads do all the following, I'll consider guilt:

a) Don't throw malware in their ads.

b) Don't throw seizure-inducing flashes in their ads.

c) Allow turning off gambling in their ads.


You’re implying that YouTube being limiteZ to creators that don’t care about getting paid would be a bad thing.

They are the ecosystem shapers, let them figure it out.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: