Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> LLMs don't communicate.

Similarly, some humans seem to unable to too. The problem is, you need to be good at communication to effectively use LLMs, judging by this thread, it's pretty clear what the problem is. I hope you figure it out someday, or just ignore LLMs, no one is forcing you to use them (I hope at least).

I don't mind what you do, and I'm not "hyping LLMs", I see them as tools that are sometimes applicable. But even to use them in that way, you need to understand how to use them. But again, maybe you don't want, that's fine too.



"However, people who do the exact same things, use the exact tools, and see all the problems for what they are? Well, they are stupid idiots with skill issues who don't know anything and probably use GPT 1.0 or something."

Perfectly exemplified


Yeah, a summary of some imaginary arguments someone else made (maybe?), quoted back to me that never said any of those things? Fun :)


The "imaginary arguments" in question:

- "If the agent/LLM you use doesn't automatically does this, I suggest you try something better, like Codex or Claude Code."

- "you don't really seem like you're looking for improving"

- "Hopefully at least someone who wants to improve comes across it so this whole conversation wasn't a complete waste of time"

- "judging by this thread, it's pretty clear what the problem is. I hope you figure it out someday"

- "you need to understand how to use them. But again, maybe you don't want"

Aka what I said previously.

At this point, adieu.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: