Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think it's really easy for people to say that the dive in quality is due to AI. I actually think it's the other way around.

I'm in my late 40s and I've been watching quality decrease in our discourse and media for decades. And I think AI is just another opportunity for them to find a way to further reduce costs. But the incentive to reduce costs is there and it's a result of market demand for convenience and low cost above all else, and it's there regardless of whether or not AI is involved.

And so I think you're asking probably the most salient question: if you're looking for high quality content, where do you go? For me, personally, I've found that people generally are not producing high-quality content for commercial gain. So I've just gotten a lot more community-focused in recent years.



I was making a joke that The Economist is garbage content, but also genAI content is also garbage.


Yeah, I think I caught on to a little bit of that in your comment, which is why I started talking about the dynamic that just because you're paying a legacy publication doesn't mean you can avoid AI. It sort of a case where there's an unlimited number of ways to produce garbage content and really only one way to produce excellent content.


Good point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: