As long as 100% of the information is true, this is fine. When competing powers reveal each other’s dirty secrets, ordinary citizens win.
But we need to be careful about injection of various messages in a factually correct information: let’s say, 99% of the facts are true, but a certain person or business is incorrectly mentioned as connected to them. It can be a genuine mistake or it can be an attack on that person or entity. This is just one of the many scenarios of using information warfare.
It would be great if a newspaper or independent OSINT team would verify this information.
he regularly does- and gets various threats from bad and dubious actors as a result. He and "have I been pwned" (troy hunt) are genuine positive actors with IRL stakes in the game.
We were seeing a lot of brute force/spraying password attempts from AS44477 a month or two ago, the setup looked fishy enough that it was easier to block the whole AS than waste time with it.
(And it's surprisingly large - ~1550 x /24 - at current market rates that IP space is probably worth something around $10-20 million).