Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What does your ideal git host do when one of its (non-paying) clients uses bots to clones repos so hard that its (paying) human clients are unable to clone their repos?


Improve infrastructure. Apparently they are trivially DDOSable by anyone renting a few servers and running git clone in a loop? That's a problem they should solve. And no, blocking by user agent is not adequate protection.


Infrastructure costs. So you'd be willing to pay more for that?


I already pay for GitHub, am fine with that and they manage. So yes.


You're not paying for the traffic load though, Microsoft does. I think it's unfair to compare a forge run by a giant and one run by a tiny company, or for that matter, self hosting users.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: