I hear you, but if you look at the examples in the link, the before and after the update results, you'll see that there's far less of that kind of ignoring of keywords.
For example a search for "can you get medicine for someone pharmacy" used to just show generic information about getting a prescription filled, skipping over the "for someone" bit.
The new results understand what the query is actually asking, which is pretty impressive.
I'm kinda with you, I grew up with a ctrl-f Google so I sort of prefer that behaviour, I think because I don't want to rely on an unreliable NLP AI.
...I was going to say "but" but.. no I think I just don't want to rely on an unreliable NLP AI. It's so frustrating when it doesn't work, which is often.
For example a search for "can you get medicine for someone pharmacy" used to just show generic information about getting a prescription filled, skipping over the "for someone" bit.
The new results understand what the query is actually asking, which is pretty impressive.
I'm kinda with you, I grew up with a ctrl-f Google so I sort of prefer that behaviour, I think because I don't want to rely on an unreliable NLP AI.
...I was going to say "but" but.. no I think I just don't want to rely on an unreliable NLP AI. It's so frustrating when it doesn't work, which is often.